<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Bricoleur Systems&#187; Bricoleur Systems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bricoleursystems.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bricoleursystems.com</link>
	<description>The Purpose Of a System Is What It Does ....</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 08:07:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
<meta xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex,follow" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scobleizer: Half Life of an Online Conversation by Bricoleur</title>
		<link>http://www.bricoleursystems.com/?p=1808&#038;cpage=1#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Bricoleur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 08:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bricoleursystems.com/?p=1808#comment-23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some second thoughts:   
I&#039;d like to see the ability to find conversation not only by date range/# of comments/likes (as Robert Scoble has suggested for FriendFeed) but also a measure of diminution- how quickly the # of comments is diminishing with each successive &quot;re-incarnation&quot; of a topic; if a conversation important enough that it is brought back to life and then generates a large number of new comments when compared to its original count it is more likely to be of lasting interest than one that got a lot of reaction at the time but no one found it worthwhile to go back and add to. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Some second thoughts:<br />
I&#8217;d like to see the ability to find conversation not only by date range/# of comments/likes (as Robert Scoble has suggested for FriendFeed) but also a measure of diminution- how quickly the # of comments is diminishing with each successive &#8220;re-incarnation&#8221; of a topic; if a conversation important enough that it is brought back to life and then generates a large number of new comments when compared to its original count it is more likely to be of lasting interest than one that got a lot of reaction at the time but no one found it worthwhile to go back and add to. <!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lean at Home: Some New Year Resolutions by Bricoleur</title>
		<link>http://www.bricoleursystems.com/?p=232&#038;cpage=1#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Bricoleur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 09:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bricoleursystems.com/2006/01/13/lean-at-home-some-new-year-resolutions/#comment-20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[McCain finally showed up on the Lettermen show - after failing to have a positive impact, and when asked by David: &quot;Now what exactly happened?&quot; McCain replies &quot;I screwed up&quot; 

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->McCain finally showed up on the Lettermen show &#8211; after failing to have a positive impact, and when asked by David: &#8220;Now what exactly happened?&#8221; McCain replies &#8220;I screwed up&#8221; </p>
<p><!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Breadcrumbs for November 20th through 15:24 by Bricoleur</title>
		<link>http://www.bricoleursystems.com/?p=1765&#038;cpage=1#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Bricoleur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bricoleursystems.com/?p=1765#comment-16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I use evernote on three different platforms in quite different ways. On my Tablet I use the Windows desktop version (original) to gather project and research notes. I use the Web version for general gathering of web clips. And, finally, I have just started using the iPhone version as part of my own schedule-diary-system (subsumes the functionality of GTD systems) ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I use evernote on three different platforms in quite different ways. On my Tablet I use the Windows desktop version (original) to gather project and research notes. I use the Web version for general gathering of web clips. And, finally, I have just started using the iPhone version as part of my own schedule-diary-system (subsumes the functionality of GTD systems) <!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Designing Freedom &amp; The Purpose of Education by Bricoleur Systems &#171; Cybernetics</title>
		<link>http://www.bricoleursystems.com/?p=1696&#038;cpage=1#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Bricoleur Systems &#171; Cybernetics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 07:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bricoleursystems.com/?p=1696#comment-12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] what does it mean to mankind that so many of our systems appear broken to even unseasoned observers?Bricoleur Systems, Sep [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->[...] what does it mean to mankind that so many of our systems appear broken to even unseasoned observers?Bricoleur Systems, Sep [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Brewing &#8230;. by Bricoleur</title>
		<link>http://www.bricoleursystems.com/?p=260&#038;cpage=1#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Bricoleur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 18:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bricoleursystems.com/2006/01/13/a-brewing/#comment-10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just stumbled across another reference indicating that the &quot;mysterious&quot; JGR Aquisitions was a subsidiary of Novell]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->I just stumbled across another reference indicating that the &#8220;mysterious&#8221; JGR Aquisitions was a subsidiary of Novell<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reading List: Fog Creek Software Management Training Program &#8211; Joel on Software by Bricoleur Systems » Blog Archive &#187; A review of the Fog Creek Software Management Training Program</title>
		<link>http://www.bricoleursystems.com/?p=729&#038;cpage=1#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Bricoleur Systems » Blog Archive &#187; A review of the Fog Creek Software Management Training Program</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 08:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bricoleursystems.com/?p=729#comment-9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] a previous post I noted that Joel Spolsky is putting together a management training program for his firm that will [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->[...] a previous post I noted that Joel Spolsky is putting together a management training program for his firm that will [...]<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oh what a dream&#8230; by Bricoleur</title>
		<link>http://www.bricoleursystems.com/?p=153&#038;cpage=1#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Bricoleur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 03:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dsoul.wordpress.com/?p=238#comment-8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your choice - join the conversation on my Tangler Tangle or just post your observation here!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Your choice &#8211; join the conversation on my Tangler Tangle or just post your observation here!<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on WARNING &#8211; Silos of Information! by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.bricoleursystems.com/?p=185&#038;cpage=1#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 01:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bricoleursystems.com/2005/02/17/warning-silos-of-information/#comment-6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Think of Airline tickets... from almost the beginning of international flights you could book on one airline for transport that included &quot;legs&quot; on another airline... this continued into the early days of batch computer systems, through the days of online but non networked systems through to today&#039;s richly interconnected network systems.
Think of international credit and debit card systems. Travel virtually anywhere and you can use your card from home. Richly interconnected systems, virtually completely interoperable but certainly not from one vendor.
In my mind a one vendor &quot;solution&quot; when the &quot;right&quot; way of doing things has yet to be determined is a recipe for hardening of the system ... if it happens through government fiat (or bribe) look for it to lead to lock-in to unworkable systems that are almost impossible to change .... this can be the only result if &quot;standardization&quot; comes as a result of single vendor lock-in.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Think of Airline tickets&#8230; from almost the beginning of international flights you could book on one airline for transport that included &#8220;legs&#8221; on another airline&#8230; this continued into the early days of batch computer systems, through the days of online but non networked systems through to today&#39;s richly interconnected network systems.<br />
Think of international credit and debit card systems. Travel virtually anywhere and you can use your card from home. Richly interconnected systems, virtually completely interoperable but certainly not from one vendor.<br />
In my mind a one vendor &#8220;solution&#8221; when the &#8220;right&#8221; way of doing things has yet to be determined is a recipe for hardening of the system &#8230; if it happens through government fiat (or bribe) look for it to lead to lock-in to unworkable systems that are almost impossible to change &#8230;. this can be the only result if &#8220;standardization&#8221; comes as a result of single vendor lock-in.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
